Fork me on GitHub

Rewarding the analysts


Science today rewards only those who collect and distribute data. There is no reward for those who organise the data and theorise based on itSydney Brenner

Those words are from a talk at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore. I disagree with a decent chunk of what Dr. Brenner had to say, but he is right with that statement. There is a reason so much of the literature today is full of data production. And we will continue to produce data, but given how automated the process has become, and faster, and easier, does this merit publication, unless it is a new species or sub-species? We need to look more at the method developers, the people developing assembly algorithms, analysis algorithms and methods and infrastructures that make managing and analyzing these data possible.

The time is now. We MUST make that change.

Image by snowriderguy under a CC-BY-NC-ND license

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

This entry was posted in Informatics, Life Science, Omics. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Comments

  1. Posted December 18, 2008 at 10:52 | Permalink

    Yes, and part of the reason for this has been lack of “Analyst Friendly” infrastructure on the Web. Remember, the initial Web (Web 1.0) gave us “Authors”, the first stage of evolution (Web 2.0) gave us the “Citizen Journalis” and “Commenttor”, and now the second stage of evolution (Web 3.0 or Linked Data Web) will usher in the “Analyst” .

    Without strucutured and interlnked data as part of the mix, the analysts cannot thrive.

    The Linking Open Data (LOD) community [1] has been on the vanguard of this effort towards a Web that facilitates “Analysis for All” :-)

    Links:
    1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Commu...
    2. http://dbpedia.org/About

  2. Posted December 18, 2008 at 15:52 | Permalink

    Yes, and part of the reason for this has been lack of “Analyst Friendly” infrastructure on the Web. Remember, the initial Web (Web 1.0) gave us “Authors”, the first stage of evolution (Web 2.0) gave us the “Citizen Journalis” and “Commenttor”, and now the second stage of evolution (Web 3.0 or Linked Data Web) will usher in the “Analyst” .

    Without strucutured and interlnked data as part of the mix, the analysts cannot thrive.

    The Linking Open Data (LOD) community [1] has been on the vanguard of this effort towards a Web that facilitates “Analysis for All” :-)

    Links:
    1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Commu...
    2. http://dbpedia.org/About

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Archives

  • Disclaimer

    All opinions on this blog are my own and do not reflect those of my employers, past or present