Fork me on GitHub

Talking open science at Ignite Seattle

My “Ask Later” talk from Ignite Seattle. Five minutes, 15 seconds per slide. Most fun talk I’ve ever given.


Update:
If you are having any trouble with the embedded video, the original can be found here

This video was originally shared on blip.tv by ignitenight with a Creative Commons Attribution license.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted in Event, Open Science, Self. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

12 Comments

  1. Stew
    Posted March 3, 2007 at 13:18 | Permalink

    Good talk! Sounds like a fun audience, too.

  2. Stew
    Posted March 3, 2007 at 16:18 | Permalink

    Good talk! Sounds like a fun audience, too.

  3. Posted March 3, 2007 at 13:23 | Permalink

    Thanks!!!

    400 very enthusiastic people and I went on at 10:45 pm (the tanks started at 8:30). It was loads of fun.

  4. Posted March 3, 2007 at 16:23 | Permalink

    Thanks!!!

    400 very enthusiastic people and I went on at 10:45 pm (the tanks started at 8:30). It was loads of fun.

  5. Posted March 4, 2007 at 03:50 | Permalink

    I am not able to view your talk from that link – do you have it available anywhere else?

  6. Posted March 4, 2007 at 06:50 | Permalink

    I am not able to view your talk from that link – do you have it available anywhere else?

  7. Posted March 4, 2007 at 07:53 | Permalink

    That was fun to watch :) . A lot of hiccups with the slide changes but overall a very cool presentation.

  8. Posted March 4, 2007 at 10:53 | Permalink

    That was fun to watch :) . A lot of hiccups with the slide changes but overall a very cool presentation.

  9. Posted March 4, 2007 at 09:47 | Permalink

    Jean-Claude, I’ve added the original link to the main post.

    Pedro, it was a blast, and luckily towards the end where the timing for ending was really important, there were no slide change timing issues.

  10. Posted March 4, 2007 at 12:47 | Permalink

    Jean-Claude, I've added the original link to the main post.

    Pedro, it was a blast, and luckily towards the end where the timing for ending was really important, there were no slide change timing issues.

  11. Posted March 4, 2007 at 14:42 | Permalink

    “It’s the data that make science happen”.

    Amen! That was great, Deepak. It really gives me a lift to see Open Science being promoted by enthusiasts like yourself.

  12. Posted March 4, 2007 at 17:42 | Permalink

    “It's the data that make science happen”.

    Amen! That was great, Deepak. It really gives me a lift to see Open Science being promoted by enthusiasts like yourself.

8 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Talking open science at Ignite Seattle [...]

  2. By business|bytes|genes|molecules on March 13, 2007 at 20:11

    [...] At the end of the article I had some of the same feelings as Sean. It’s good to see that scientific applications of Web 2.0 concepts is become a little more prevalent, although still out of the mainstream (It was one reason I submitted a talk to Ignite Seattle). That said, I hope Timo blogs about this somewhere, as I am sure he can add some meat to the description at RWW. [...]

  3. By business|bytes|genes|molecules on April 4, 2007 at 21:14

    [...] … or today depending on your timezone. The list of Ask Later talks is now up. Speaking at Ignite 2 was one of the most enjoyable experiences of my life. Once again Ignite Seattle will be held at the CHAC, and will be preceded by a MAKE event [...]

  4. [...] 24th, 2007 · No Comments Deepak has blogged about Ignite Seattle an informal gathering organized by Oreilly in Seattlegeared towards the local tech crowd. I always wondered why Boston does not have an Ignite event as well considering its huge tech population. [...]

  5. By business|bytes|genes|molecules on June 9, 2007 at 20:48

    [...] Joerg points to a paper by O. Sacher that touches upon an issue that was one of the underlying themes for my Ignite Seattle talk, namely the lack of information on science blogs. Sachter writes One disadvantage of chemical blogs containing structures, reactions, or spectras is that the original information is lost, means the raw data. This restriction is already discussed in the blogosphere and will be hopefully solved soon. [...]

  6. [...] Talking open science at Ignite Seattle [...]

  7. [...] at Nature Precedings (and the associated original blog post coining the term), and Deepak Singh’s talk on Open Science at Ignite Seattle. From there I was inspired to seize the opportunity, get a blog of my own, and get involved. The [...]

  8. [...] metrics aren’t perfect yet, but this is a great start and, self plug here, the core of my first Ignite Seattle talk. One could say that this system could be gamed, but the safe assumption is that the chances of [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Archives

  • Disclaimer

    All opinions on this blog are my own and do not reflect those of my employers, past or present